CJEU rules that detention under the border procedure does not have to take place at the border

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has clarified that detention centres holding applicants for international protection under the border procedure do not need to be located at the external border of a Member State. It also confirmed that continued detention after the expiry of the border procedure time limit may be permissible under certain conditions. The judgment further addresses the validity of procedural steps taken during the border procedure and reiterates key safeguards under EU law.

The cases referred to the CJEU concerned several third-country nationals who arrived by air at Brussels Airport in 2023 and applied for international protection. The Belgian authorities refused them entry to the national territory and placed them in detention centres located within Belgium as part of the border procedure provided for under EU law. After the four-week period for that procedure expired, the examination of their applications continued under a priority procedure. The applicants remained in detention in the same centres, on the basis of a risk of absconding, and their applications were subsequently rejected. A Belgian court asked the CJEU whether EU law allows detention in facilities not located at the border.

The Court ruled that EU law does not require detention under the border procedure to take place at the physical border. Member States may therefore use facilities located within their territory. It also held that applicants may remain in detention in the same facilities after the expiry of the border procedure time limit, provided that the legal grounds and conditions for detention continue to be met and that applicants are informed of any change in their legal situation.

In addition, the Court confirmed that investigative steps carried out during the border procedure remain valid in subsequent procedures, without prejudice to the possibility for applicants to submit additional elements. It reiterated that detention must not be automatic or systematic and may only be applied where it is necessary, proportionate and limited to the period required, on the basis of an individual assessment in each case.

For further information, please read the press release from the Court of Justice below, or consult the judgment for full details.

Publication Date:
Geography:
Keywords:
Main theme:
News type: